Is AI crossing the line with Actor voices?

The movie industry is on the cusp of a technological revolution, driven by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI). One of the most transformative, yet controversial, applications of AI is the ability to replicate actor voices, raising significant ethical and legal questions. As AI continues to evolve, the implications for the use of actor voices without consent have become a hot topic, prompting discussions among industry professionals, legal experts, and policymakers.

The Technological Leap: AI Voice Replication

AI voice replication technology, often utilizing deep learning and neural networks, can create realistic and convincing audio imitations of human voices. Companies like Adobe with their VoCo project and startups like Lyrebird and Respeecher have demonstrated the potential of AI to generate lifelike voices that can mimic specific individuals. This technology can be used for various purposes in the movie industry, such as dubbing, voiceovers, and even resurrecting the voices of deceased actors for new projects.

READ MORE: Lithium-ion vs. Lead Acid Batteries: Environmental Impacts and Consumer Choices

Recent feud between the Hollywood and AI developers has shook the movie and tech industry. Hollywood officials claim that OpenAI’s apparent tribute to the film “Her,” which features Scarlett Johansson’s voice, is causing a reaction against artificial intelligence.
Even as Hollywood studios test new tools and consider partnerships with OpenAI, Johansson’s accusations that the ChatGPT-maker copied her performance in the Spike Jonze-directed feature film, after failing to reach an agreement, reignited the creative class’s fear about the existential threat posed by AI.

OpenAI astonished everyone by producing videos that resembled feature films using their text-to-video tool, Sora. According to agents and industry experts, the company has since been met several times by Hollywood executives and agencies to discuss possible creative partnerships and applications of the technology.

Are we looking at a legal dispute that will be settled and the future of movie making is AI?

AI is currently implemented in every day life of individuals and businesses. Speeding up processes, the way we communicate and the way we receive information has been revolutionized by the new technology. The AI implementation into film and music making is still controversial but very likely in the near future. We all see and use “smart” phones, autonomous bank machines, cash registers, fuel pumps and airport check in, check out counters, thinking that AI will not be expanded into movie making is very naive. The only obstacle for further implementation of AI are surely ethical and legal implications.

Ethical Implications

The ethical concerns surrounding AI-generated voices are profound. Key issues include:

1. Consent and Ownership: Actors have traditionally controlled the use of their voices and likenesses. AI-generated voices challenge this control, potentially allowing studios to use an actor’s voice without their permission.
2. Deception and Authenticity: Using AI to replicate voices can mislead audiences, creating a false impression that an actor endorsed or participated in a project.
3. Economic Impact: If studios can replicate voices, they may reduce the need for actors, affecting livelihoods and changing the economic dynamics of the industry.

READ MORE: Are we about to witness catastrophic AI outcome?

Legal Landscape in the United States

As of now, there is no comprehensive federal law in the United States specifically addressing the use of AI to replicate voices without consent. However, several legal frameworks and precedents can be relevant:

1. Right of Publicity: This law protects individuals from unauthorized commercial use of their name, likeness, and voice. Notable cases like Midler v. Ford Motor Co. have set precedents where unauthorized use of a distinctive voice for commercial purposes was deemed unlawful.
2. Intellectual Property: Copyright and trademark laws may offer some protection. For example, a unique voice could be considered part of an actor’s personal brand, thus protected under trademark law.
3. Contractual Agreements: Actors often negotiate contracts that explicitly control the use of their voice and likeness. Breaches of these agreements can result in legal action.

International Perspectives

Internationally, the legal approach to AI-generated voices varies:

1. European Union: The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) offers some protection regarding personal data, which can include voice. Consent is a cornerstone of GDPR, potentially limiting unauthorized use.
2. United Kingdom: Similar to the EU, the UK’s data protection laws require consent for the use of personal data. Additionally, the UK has robust right of publicity laws.
3. China: China is rapidly developing its AI regulations. Recent laws emphasize data protection and may offer some recourse against unauthorized use of personal attributes.

Industry Response and Future Directions

The movie industry is beginning to grapple with these issues. Some studios and production companies are proactively addressing ethical concerns by:

• Developing Ethical Guidelines: Creating standards for the ethical use of AI in filmmaking, ensuring transparency and respect for actor rights.
• Seeking Consent: Implementing policies to obtain explicit consent from actors for the use of AI-generated voices.
• Collaborating with Legal Experts: Working with legal professionals to navigate the evolving landscape and ensure compliance with emerging laws.

As we can see, there are many obstacles and dangers of uncontrolled AI usage, from personal protection, legal and ethical aspects, AI technology will be our future but most likely a regulated one.